Tourneau v. Tishman & Lipp

Second Circuit

Tourneau v. Tishman & Lipp

211 F.2d 240

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 1954

DocketNo. 186, Docket 22909

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 F.2d 240 (Tourneau v. Tishman & Lipp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tourneau v. Tishman & Lipp, 211 F.2d 240 (2d Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are content to affirm on the fully reasoned opinion of District Judge Lei-bell, 119 F.Supp. 593, holding invalid Design Patent No. Des. 161,296 for “Combined Watchcase and Bracelet” issued to the individual plaintiff on December 19, 1950, and declining to find defendant guilty of unfair competition with plaintiffs in the sale of watchcases and bracelets. If the new patent code, 35 U.S.C. § 103, July 19, 1952, is applicable, the result, we believe, must remain the same.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are content to affirm on the fully reasoned opinion of District Judge Lei-bell, 119 F.Supp. 593, holding invalid Design Patent No. Des. 161,296 for “Combined Watchcase and Bracelet” issued to the individual plaintiff on December 19, 1950, and declining to find defendant guilty of unfair competition with plaintiffs in the sale of watchcases and bracelets. If the new patent code, 35 U.S.C. § 103, July 19, 1952, is applicable, the result, we believe, must remain the same.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 F.2d 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tourneau-v-tishman-lipp-ca2-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack