Toure v. State
This text of 2020 ND 211 (Toure v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/21/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 211
Omar Toure, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20200040
Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Benjamen J. Johnson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Steven Balaban, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williston, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Toure v. State No. 20200040
[¶1] Omar Toure appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Following a post-conviction hearing, the court found Toure failed to demonstrate any prejudice from the alleged errors of his trial counsel and therefore failed to satisfy the Strickland test for ineffective assistance of counsel. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The court did not clearly err in denying Toure’s application for post-conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 211, 949 N.W.2d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toure-v-state-nd-2020.