Touhy v. Murdock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Touhy v. Murdock

7 A.D.2d 1024, 187 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9500

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 1024 (Touhy v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Touhy v. Murdock, 7 A.D.2d 1024, 187 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9500 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York which granted an application pursuant to subdivisions “ £ ”, “ h ”, and “ i ” of section 7 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York for a variance to permit the erection and operation of a gasoline service station and accessory uses, in a retail use district, for a period of 15 years, subject to conditions and safeguards imposed by the board, the appeal is from an order granting the motions of the respondents and of the intervenor-respondent to vacate the order of certiorari, to dismiss the petition, and to affirm the board’s determination. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York which granted an application pursuant to subdivisions “ £ ”, “ h ”, and “ i ” of section 7 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York for a variance to permit the erection and operation of a gasoline service station and accessory uses, in a retail use district, for a period of 15 years, subject to conditions and safeguards imposed by the board, the appeal is from an order granting the motions of the respondents and of the intervenor-respondent to vacate the order of certiorari, to dismiss the petition, and to affirm the board’s determination. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 1024, 187 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/touhy-v-murdock-nyappdiv-1959.