Totton v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Totton v. Superior Court

13 P. 72, 72 Cal. 37, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 453

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 17, 1887

DocketNo. 11886

StatusPublished

This text of 13 P. 72 (Totton v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Totton v. Superior Court, 13 P. 72, 72 Cal. 37, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 453 (Cal. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court.

— Application for a writ of review.

In this case the notice of appeal to the Superior Court was properly given. If there is an attorney of record in Justices’ Courts, the statute does not require that an attorney should sign the notice of appeal. It may be [38]*38signed by the party, or any person he may select for that purpose. (Civ. Code Proc., secs. 842, 974.)

The petition is sufficient, and the demurrer thereto is overruled.

The order dismissing the appeal is annulled and. quashed.

Ordered accordingly.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI