Totten v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 14, 2009
Docket09-6182
StatusUnpublished

This text of Totten v. Johnson (Totten v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Totten v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6182

ELEAZAR TOTTEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

P. JOHNSON, Nurse; NURSE BARHAM; NURSE HENTON; N. KOLONGO, Doctor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-01299-CMH-TRJ)

Submitted: July 17, 2009 Decided: August 14, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eleazar Totten, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eleazar Totten appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006), for failure to state a claim. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Totten v. Johnson, 1:08-cv-01299-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. Jan. 16,

2009). We deny Totten’s motion for documents. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Totten v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/totten-v-johnson-ca4-2009.