Home/District of Columbia/Toth v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na

Toth v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Toth v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 F. Supp. 3d 373 →
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 9, 2015·No. Civil Action No. 2014-0395·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED

MAR 0 9 2015

Giark, us. District & Bankruptcy Courts fat the District of Columbia

Civil Case No. 14-00395 (RJL)

WILLIAM STEPHEN TOTH, Plaintiff,

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et (11.,

Defendants. ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered thisZ day of March 2015, it is hereby

ORDERED that Justine Smith’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint [Dkt. # 4] is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Bank Defendants” Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint [Dkt. # 8] is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

RICHARD J. L United Statés' ‘

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toth v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na, (D.D.C. 2015).

Toth v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na (Toth v. Wells Fargo Bank, Na) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.