Toth v. Toth

Missouri Court of Appeals

Toth v. Toth

307 S.W.3d 189, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 370, 2010 WL 1049254

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 23, 2010

DocketED 93520

StatusPublished

This text of 307 S.W.3d 189 (Toth v. Toth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toth v. Toth, 307 S.W.3d 189, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 370, 2010 WL 1049254 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dina Toth appeals from the trial court’s grant of Joseph (“Joe”) Toth’s motion for summary judgment on her second amended petition for damages.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI