Home/Supreme Court/Totaro v. United States District Court for the District of South Dakota

Totaro v. United States District Court for the District of South Dakota

568 U.S. 1066, 133 S. Ct. 810, 184 L. Ed. 2d 580, 81 U.S.L.W. 3325, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 9453
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 10, 2012
DocketNo. 12-7122
StatusPublished

This text of 568 U.S. 1066 (Totaro v. United States District Court for the District of South Dakota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Totaro v. United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, 568 U.S. 1066, 133 S. Ct. 810, 184 L. Ed. 2d 580, 81 U.S.L.W. 3325, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 9453 (2012).

Opinion

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certio-rari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
568 U.S. 1066, 133 S. Ct. 810, 184 L. Ed. 2d 580, 81 U.S.L.W. 3325, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 9453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/totaro-v-united-states-district-court-for-the-district-of-south-dakota-scotus-2012.