Toston v. Missouri Division of Employment Security

125 F. App'x 82
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 7, 2005
Docket04-1737
StatusUnpublished

This text of 125 F. App'x 82 (Toston v. Missouri Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toston v. Missouri Division of Employment Security, 125 F. App'x 82 (8th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Phyllis Toston appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary *83 judgment in this Title VII action Toston brought against her former employer, the Missouri Division of Employment Security. Following careful review, we agree with the district court that Toston presented nothing in support of her bare allegation that her employer’s legitimate reason for terminating her—poor performance—was a pretext for race discrimination, see Riggs v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 385 F.3d 1164, 1166 (8th Cir.2004), or retaliation, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 738 (8th Cir.2004). In addition, to the extent she pleaded a hostile-work-environment claim, Toston failed to show harassment pervasive or severe enough to affect a term, condition, or privilege of her employment. See id. at 739. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District *83 of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 F. App'x 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toston-v-missouri-division-of-employment-security-ca8-2005.