Toston v. Missouri Division of Employment Security

125 F. App'x 82
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2005·No. 04-1737·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Phyllis Toston appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary *83 judgment in this Title VII action Toston brought against her former employer, the Missouri Division of Employment Security. Following careful review, we agree with the district court that Toston presented nothing in support of her bare allegation that her employer’s legitimate reason for terminating her—poor performance—was a pretext for race discrimination, see Riggs v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 385 F.3d 1164, 1166 (8th Cir.2004), or retaliation, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 738 (8th Cir.2004). In addition, to the extent she pleaded a hostile-work-environment claim, Toston failed to show harassment pervasive or severe enough to affect a term, condition, or privilege of her employment. See id. at 739. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District *83 of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Toston v. Missouri Division of Employment Security, 125 F. App'x 82 (8th Cir. 2005).

125 F. App'x 82 (Toston v. Missouri Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related