Tosto v. Marra Bros.

275 A.D.2d 686

This text of 275 A.D.2d 686 (Tosto v. Marra Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tosto v. Marra Bros., 275 A.D.2d 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

Plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence [687]*687as matter of law." In view of the testimony of the witnesses to the accident, including plaintiff’s, that defendant’s truck was stopped at the center of the twenty-two foot roadway when plaintiff’s truck was twenty-five to thirty feet away, with nothing between them, plaintiff’s testimony that he looked and did not see the defendant’s truck is incredible as matter of law. (Dolfini v. Erie R. R. Co., 178 N. Y. 1.) The questions of fact have been examined and, in any event, reversal of the judgment as against the weight of the evidence would have been ordered. Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Sneed, J., concur for reversal of the judgment but dissent as to dismissal of the complaint and vote to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dolfini v. . Erie R.R. Co.
70 N.E. 68 (New York Court of Appeals, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tosto-v-marra-bros-nyappdiv-1949.