Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Tosco v. State

Tosco v. State

686 So. 2d 787, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 220, 1997 WL 20759
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 22, 1997
DocketNo. 96-2670
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 686 So. 2d 787 (Tosco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tosco v. State, 686 So. 2d 787, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 220, 1997 WL 20759 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eduardo Tosco petitions for a writ of habe-as corpus asserting that his appellate counsel was ineffective in this court’s appeal numbers 93-1044 and 93-1059. The State concedes that petitioner-defendant’s sentence exceeds the legal maximum in circuit court case number 91-8446 and in count one of circuit court ease number 91-9721. We grant the petition as to these two sentences and remand for resentencing. Defendant need not be present at resentencing.

[788]*788We find no merit with respect to the remainder of the petition.

Petition granted in part, denied in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. State
701 So. 2d 129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 787, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 220, 1997 WL 20759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tosco-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.