Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. v. United States

2016 CIT 50
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedMay 11, 2016
Docket14-00211
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 CIT 50 (Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. v. United States, 2016 CIT 50 (cit 2016).

Opinion

Slip Op. 16 - 50

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

: TOSCELIK PROFIL VE SAC ENDUSTRISI A.S., : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge : UNITED STATES, : Court No. 14-00211 : Defendant. : :

JUDGMENT

As discussed in slip opinion 15-144 (Dec. 21, 2015), the plaintiff, Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. (“Toscelik”), persuaded that remand of Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes And Tubes From Turkey: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; Calendar Year 2012 and Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, in Part, 79 Fed. Reg. 51140 (Aug. 27, 2014) (“2012 Review”) to the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”), was appropriate for consideration of the application of the amended 2011 final results of Toscelik’s net subsidy rate to this matter; and thereafter Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand dated April 14, 2016 having been filed with the court on April 15, 2016, ECF No. 37 (“Redetermination”); and the parties’ joint status report of May 4, 2016 having explained that Commerce under respectful protest applied the amended 2011 rate to the 2012 Review; and that report further indicating, inter alia, that the parties agree the Redetermination satisfies the remand order and should be sustained; Now, therefore, in view of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that those results of the Redetermination be, and they hereby are, sustained.

/s/ R. Kenton Musgrave R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge

Dated: May 11, 2016 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 CIT 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toscelik-profil-ve-sac-endustrisi-as-v-united-states-cit-2016.