Toscano v. Meyerhoefer

277 A.D.2d 1013

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1013 (Toscano v. Meyerhoefer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toscano v. Meyerhoefer, 277 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff, a pedestrian, when struck by defendant’s automobile. Judgment, dismissing the complaint on the merits, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that questions of fact were presented which should have been submitted to the jury for determination. (Cf. Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of Buffalo, 278 N. Y. 1, 7, and Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 N. Y. 241.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and Mac-Crate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of Buffalo
14 N.E.2d 828 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.
54 N.E.2d 809 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toscano-v-meyerhoefer-nyappdiv-1950.