Tosado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tosado v. State

175 So. 3d 935, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14988, 2015 WL 5883717

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 9, 2015

DocketNo. 5D13-1840

StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 3d 935 (Tosado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tosado v. State, 175 So. 3d 935, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14988, 2015 WL 5883717 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

WALLIS, J.

Heriberto Tosado (“Appellant”) appeals his judgment and sentence for convictions of possession of burglary tools, grand theft, burglary of a structure, criminal mischief, driving without a valid license, and driving with a suspended license.¹ We find that only one issue on appeal has merit.

Appellant argues, inter alia, that double jeopardy prohibits dual convictions for driving with a suspended license in violation of section 322.34(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2013), and driving without a valid license in violation of section 322.03(1), Florida Statutes (2013). Athough Appellant did not raise this issue below, a violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy constitutes fundamental error, which can be raised for the first time on appeal. Barfield v. State, 871 So.2d 929, 930 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). The State properly concedes that the elements of driving without a valid license are subsumed by the elements of driving with a suspended license. Roedel v. State, 773 So.2d 1280, 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“In other words, section 322.03(1) is a" necessary lesser included offense of section 322.34(2).”). On remand, we instruct the trial court to vacate Appellant’s judgment and sentence for driving without a valid license.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

LAWSON, C.J., and TORPY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALLIS, J.

Heriberto Tosado (“Appellant”) appeals his judgment and sentence for convictions of possession of burglary tools, grand theft, burglary of a structure, criminal mischief, driving without a valid license, and driving with a suspended license.¹ We find that only one issue on appeal has merit.

Appellant argues, inter alia, that double jeopardy prohibits dual convictions for driving with a suspended license in violation of section 322.34(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2013), and driving without a valid license in violation of section 322.03(1), Florida Statutes (2013). Athough Appellant did not raise this issue below, a violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy constitutes fundamental error, which can be raised for the first time on appeal. Barfield v. State, 871 So.2d 929, 930 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). The State properly concedes that the elements of driving without a valid license are subsumed by the elements of driving with a suspended license. Roedel v. State, 773 So.2d 1280, 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“In other words, section 322.03(1) is a" necessary lesser included offense of section 322.34(2).”). On remand, we instruct the trial court to vacate Appellant’s judgment and sentence for driving without a valid license.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

LAWSON, C.J., and TORPY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 So. 3d 935, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14988, 2015 WL 5883717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tosado-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack