Tortola v. NHT Owners, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tortola v. NHT Owners, LLC

25 A.D.3d 600, 806 N.Y.S.2d 890

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 2006·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated June 13, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs motion to quash three subpoenas served upon nonparties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to demonstrate that unusual or unanticipated circumstances occurred after the filing of the note of issue which required the nonparty depositions sought in their subpoenas to prevent substantial prejudice (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff’s motion to quash the subpoenas (see Candray v Eicher, 19 AD3d 352 [2005]; Gigliotti v Allstate Ins. Co., 258 AD2d 559 [1999]; Scocozza v Tolia, 254 AD2d 475 [1998]; Koonmen v Town of Brookhaven, 236 AD2d 591 [1997]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated June 13, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs motion to quash three subpoenas served upon nonparties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to demonstrate that unusual or unanticipated circumstances occurred after the filing of the note of issue which required the nonparty depositions sought in their subpoenas to prevent substantial prejudice (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff’s motion to quash the subpoenas (see Candray v Eicher, 19 AD3d 352 [2005]; Gigliotti v Allstate Ins. Co., 258 AD2d 559 [1999]; Scocozza v Tolia, 254 AD2d 475 [1998]; Koonmen v Town of Brookhaven, 236 AD2d 591 [1997]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Tortola v. NHT Owners, LLC, 25 A.D.3d 600, 806 N.Y.S.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

25 A.D.3d 600 (Tortola v. NHT Owners, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related