Torry S. Tellefsen, and Sandra K. Boozer v. Sylvia Flack Alice E. Johnson Carol Boles Cathy Canzona Winston-Salem State University

37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34889, 1994 WL 564723
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 17, 1994
Docket94-1464
StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1495 (Torry S. Tellefsen, and Sandra K. Boozer v. Sylvia Flack Alice E. Johnson Carol Boles Cathy Canzona Winston-Salem State University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torry S. Tellefsen, and Sandra K. Boozer v. Sylvia Flack Alice E. Johnson Carol Boles Cathy Canzona Winston-Salem State University, 37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34889, 1994 WL 564723 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Torry S. TELLEFSEN, Plaintiff Appellant,
and
Sandra K. Boozer, Plaintiff,
v.
Sylvia FLACK; Alice E. Johnson; Carol Boles; Cathy
Canzona; Winston-Salem State University,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1464.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.
Decided Oct. 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-91-301-6)

Torry S. Tellefsen, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Oregon Lawton, III, Associate Attorney General, Thomas J. Ziko, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tellefsen v. Flack, No. CA-91-301-6 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34889, 1994 WL 564723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torry-s-tellefsen-and-sandra-k-boozer-v-sylvia-fla-ca4-1994.