Torrillo v. Greater New York Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Torrillo v. Greater New York Ass'n

13 A.D.2d 812, 217 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 812 (Torrillo v. Greater New York Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torrillo v. Greater New York Ass'n, 13 A.D.2d 812, 217 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff when he fell on a stairway in defendant’s premises, the fall allegedly having been caused by the negligent failure of defendant to control the crowd of people on the stairway and to remove debris therefrom, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 10, 1960, made on reargument, granting plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury’s verdict in favor of defendant, and directing a new trial. The motion was made and granted because of error in the charge. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff when he fell on a stairway in defendant’s premises, the fall allegedly having been caused by the negligent failure of defendant to control the crowd of people on the stairway and to remove debris therefrom, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 10, 1960, made on reargument, granting plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury’s verdict in favor of defendant, and directing a new trial. The motion was made and granted because of error in the charge. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 812, 217 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrillo-v-greater-new-york-assn-nyappdiv-1961.