Torrez-Valenzuela v. Holder

417 F. App'x 675
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 2011
Docket07-74797
StatusUnpublished

This text of 417 F. App'x 675 (Torrez-Valenzuela v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torrez-Valenzuela v. Holder, 417 F. App'x 675 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maricela Torrez-Valenzuela, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’" order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion" to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of *676 a motion to reopen. Sharma v. INS, 89 F.3d 545, 547 (9th Cir.1996). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Torrez-Valenzuela’s motion to reopen because her reliance upon an outdated bus schedule does not constitute exceptional circumstances within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 F. App'x 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrez-valenzuela-v-holder-ca9-2011.