Torrez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Torrez v. State

438 So. 2d 541, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21832

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 1983·No. No. 83-455·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, the portions of the trial court’s order requiring appellant to pay ten dollars pursuant to section 960.20 (Crimes Compensation Trust Fund), ten dollars pursuant to section 775.0835 (optional fine for the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund), and four dollars pursuant to sections 943.25(4) and 943.25(8) (Law Enforcement Training and Correctional Officer Training Trust Funds), are stricken since the trial court adjudged appellant insolvent prior to trial and appointed the public defender to represent him. Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (question certified).

HOBSON, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, the portions of the trial court’s order requiring appellant to pay ten dollars pursuant to section 960.20 (Crimes Compensation Trust Fund), ten dollars pursuant to section 775.0835 (optional fine for the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund), and four dollars pursuant to sections 943.25(4) and 943.25(8) (Law Enforcement Training and Correctional Officer Training Trust Funds), are stricken since the trial court adjudged appellant insolvent prior to trial and appointed the public defender to represent him. Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (question certified).

HOBSON, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Torrez v. State, 438 So. 2d 541, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

438 So. 2d 541 (Torrez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related