Torrey v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
95 N.E. 1142, 209 Mass. 43, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 896
Opinion
The evidence did not justify a finding that the starting signal by bell was given by the conductor or by his direction.
The charge, though brief, stated the law tersely and correctly, and is not justly open to the criticisms made by the plaintiff that it was contradictory and misleading.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Torrey v. Boston Elevated Railway Co., 95 N.E. 1142, 209 Mass. 43, 1911 Mass. LEXIS 896 (Mass. 1911).
95 N.E. 1142 (Torrey v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Killam v. Wellesley & Boston Street Railway Co.
101 N.E. 374 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)