Torres v. Westchester Dental Services, P. C.

287 A.D.2d 710, 732 N.Y.S.2d 89, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10045
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered March 21, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A motion for summary judgment must be made within 120 days of the filing of a note of issue “except with leave of court on good cause shown” (CPLR 3212 [a]; see, Gonzalez v 98 Mag Leasing Corp., 95 NY2d 124, 128; Olzaski v Locust Val. Cent. School Dist., 256 AD2d 320, 321). The defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, filed more than eight months after the filing of the note of issue, was untimely. Moreover, it was made without leave of the court and without good cause shown for the delay (see, Clifford v Harrow Stores, 274 AD2d 370; Olzaski v Locust Val. Cent. School Dist., supra). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion.

The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. Santucci, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torres v. Westchester Dental Services, P. C., 287 A.D.2d 710, 732 N.Y.S.2d 89, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10045 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

287 A.D.2d 710 (Torres v. Westchester Dental Services, P. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Nunez
2026 NY Slip Op 00935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Falcone v. Khurana
294 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Tavkar v. Cab
289 A.D.2d 221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)