Torres v. West Street Realty Co.
This text of 1 A.D.3d 180 (Torres v. West Street Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Salman, J.), entered April 4, 2003, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for an order compelling defendants and third-party defendant to permit the inspection of a certain loading dock and platform, unanimously dismissed as moot, with one bill of costs payable by defendants-appellants to plaintiffs.
Appellants’ claim that the court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for inspection of the accident site after a note of issue had already been filed is moot because they did not seek or obtain a stay of the court’s order, and plaintiffs’ expert has already inspected the subject premises. In any event, there were extraordinary circumstances in this case justifying a post-note-of-issue inspection for the purpose of opposing defendants’ summary judgment motion, which was also post-note-of-issue (compare Boisvert v Town of Grafton, 131 AD2d 910 [1987]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.3d 180, 766 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-west-street-realty-co-nyappdiv-2003.