Torres v. Washington Heights Business Improvement District Management Ass'n
This text of 57 A.D.3d 214 (Torres v. Washington Heights Business Improvement District Management Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Summary dismissal was properly granted in this matter where plaintiff was injured when she tripped on a plastic bag during a street fair that was hosted and sponsored by defendant. Although defendant, as a licensee who obtained permission to use the designated streets to sponsor and host the fair, owed a duty of care to maintain the area in a reasonably safe condition (see Maheshwari v City of New York, 2 NY3d 288, 294 [2004]), the evidence demonstrates that defendant established its entitlement to summary judgment by showing that it had no constructive notice of the defective condition (see Smith v Costco Wholesale Corp., 50 AD3d 499 [2008]). The general awareness of litter in the streets is insufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether defendant had constructive notice of the plastic bag that caused plaintiffs fall (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 838 [1986]; Melendez v New York City Hous. Auth., 23 AD3d 211 [2005]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Catterson, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 A.D.3d 214, 868 N.Y.2d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-washington-heights-business-improvement-district-management-assn-nyappdiv-2008.