Torres v. Upfield US Inc.

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: JOSEPHINE TORRES, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 1:20-cv-05025 (MKV) -against- KOHLBERG, KRAVIS, ROBERTS & CO L-P., ORDER OF DISMISSAL CONOPCO, INC., and UPFIELD US INC., Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendant informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 99]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by December 8, 2023. Ifno such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. ts | hs (/ nel Date: November 8, 2023 MARY Y KOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge