Torres v. Stultz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Torres v. Stultz

601 So. 2d 313, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7882, 1992 WL 153925

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 7, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1907

StatusPublished

This text of 601 So. 2d 313 (Torres v. Stultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torres v. Stultz, 601 So. 2d 313, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7882, 1992 WL 153925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Philip and Jane Torres appeal an adverse final judgment in an automobile accident case. The objections to several improper statements in closing argument were sustained, and in some instances curative instructions were given even though not requested. The complained-of remarks did not rise to the level which would call for a new trial, and the trial court acted well within its discretion in so ruling. See State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116, 117-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Philip and Jane Torres appeal an adverse final judgment in an automobile accident case. The objections to several improper statements in closing argument were sustained, and in some instances curative instructions were given even though not requested. The complained-of remarks did not rise to the level which would call for a new trial, and the trial court acted well within its discretion in so ruling. See State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116, 117-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

601 So. 2d 313, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7882, 1992 WL 153925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-stultz-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack