Torres v. State

715 So. 2d 1151, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10833, 1998 WL 537018
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 1998·No. No. 97-3054·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions for resisting arrest with violence and battery on a law enforcement officer. We must also affirm the defendant’s sentence as a habitual violent felony offender since the defendant failed to preserve this issue for appellate review. See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (1997); Speights v. State, 711 So.2d 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Pryor v. State, 704 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Middleton v. State, 689 So.2d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant to seek posteonviction relief. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Young v. State, 716 So.2d 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Hicks v. State, 711 So.2d 1366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Ellis v. State, 703 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torres v. State, 715 So. 2d 1151, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10833, 1998 WL 537018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

715 So. 2d 1151 (Torres v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
738 So. 2d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Jackson v. State
764 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)