Torres v. Starbucks Corporation

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: May 23, 2024
• Docket: 1:24-cv-03945
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ij SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALLY FILED eter OS: Cocaine Se) gO aL nite a ey od eee Bae So ee □ ! KELVYS SALAS TORRES, leer SEO, Plaintiff, -against- 24-cv-3945 (LAK) STARBUCKS CORPORATION, etc,, et al., Defendants ewe □□ eee ewe ee we eee ee ee ee ee HX

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: K The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 ar Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). CO The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). Oo The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before June 4, 2024 of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 23, 2024 Mi. Lewis United States Distriet Judge