Torres v. Scopetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Torres v. Scopetta

2 A.D.3d 533, 767 N.Y.S.2d 904

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 533 (Torres v. Scopetta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torres v. Scopetta, 2 A.D.3d 533, 767 N.Y.S.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 to set aside a voluntary surrender of parental rights, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J), dated May 30, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly denied the petition of the biological father seeking to revoke the judicial surrender of his child because the conditions of the surrender relating to ongoing contact with the child allegedly were violated (see Social Services Law § 383-c [6] [d]; Matter of Sabrina H., 245 AD2d 1134 [1997]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 to set aside a voluntary surrender of parental rights, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J), dated May 30, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly denied the petition of the biological father seeking to revoke the judicial surrender of his child because the conditions of the surrender relating to ongoing contact with the child allegedly were violated (see Social Services Law § 383-c [6] [d]; Matter of Sabrina H., 245 AD2d 1134 [1997]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 533, 767 N.Y.S.2d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-scopetta-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack