Torres v. Patricias Morris Park Corp.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X BRAYNIEL TORRES, individually and on : behalf of others similarly situated, : : Plaintiff, : 23-CV-7820 (RWL) : - against - : : ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT PATRICIAS MORRIS PARK CORP., a New : AND DISMISSING CASE York corporation and PATRICIA : BORGOGNONE, an individual, : : Defendants. : ---------------------------------------------------------------X ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”) and the New York Labor Law. Before the Court is the parties’ joint letter request that the Court approve their settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”), a fully executed copy of which was submitted on July 21, 2025. A federal court is obligated to determine whether settlement of an FLSA case under the court’s consideration is fair and reasonable and the subject of an arm’s length negotiation, not an employer’s overreaching. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The Court assisted the parties in mediating resolution of this case and has carefully reviewed the Settlement Agreement as well as the parties’ letter. The Court has taken into account, without limitation, prior proceedings in this action; the attendant risks, burdens, and costs associated with continuing the action; the range of possible recovery; whether the Settlement Agreement is the product of arm’s length bargaining between experienced counsel or parties; the amount of attorney’s fees; and the possibility of fraud or collusion. Among other attributes of the Settlement Agreement, there are no confidentiality restrictions or non-disparagement provisions; the Plaintiffs release is narrowly tailored to wage and hour claims; and the attorneys’ fees are within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range. Considering all the circumstances, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair and reasonable and hereby approved. This case, having resolved by settlement, is hereby dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party, except as provided for in the parties’ settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate all motions and deadlines, and close this case. SO ORDERED. = UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: July 22, 2025 New York, New York Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Torres v. Patricias Morris Park Corp. (Torres v. Patricias Morris Park Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.