Torres v. O'Quinn

Fourth Circuit

Torres v. O'Quinn

213 F. App'x 210

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2007·No. No. 06-7770·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Don Juan Torres appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Torres v. O’Quinn, No. 7:06-cv-00576-GEC, 2006 WL 2850642 (W.D.Va. Sept. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [211]*211and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Don Juan Torres appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Torres v. O’Quinn, No. 7:06-cv-00576-GEC, 2006 WL 2850642 (W.D.Va. Sept. 29, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [211]*211and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Torres v. O'Quinn, 213 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

213 F. App'x 210 (Torres v. O'Quinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related