Torres v. New York State Comptroller

192 A.D.2d 861, 596 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3749
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 192 A.D.2d 861 (Torres v. New York State Comptroller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torres v. New York State Comptroller, 192 A.D.2d 861, 596 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s requests for ordinary and accidental disability retirement benefits.

We reject petitioner’s contention that respondent Comptrol[862]*862ler erred in denying her applications for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits. Although the medical experts testifying at the hearings agreed that petitioner had chronic back sprain and a bulging disc at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels, they disagreed regarding the significance of these findings. Petitioner’s expert opined that the bulge was significant while the expert for respondent State and Local Employees’ Retirement System concluded that the bulging was not unusual and presented no problem. The experts also differed as to petitioner’s prognosis. Her physician stated that she was permanently incapacitated from performing her duties as a groundskeeper. The Retirement System’s physician testified to the contrary. It was for the Comptroller to evaluate the conflicting medical evidence (see, Matter of Ramseur v Regan, 154 AD2d 869) and it was within his authority to accord greater weight to the testimony of one physician over another (see, Matter of Walker v Regan, 97 AD2d 878). Because we find substantial evidence in the record to support the Comptroller’s determination, it must be upheld (see, Matter of Heavey v Regan, 161 AD2d 917).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. McCall
259 A.D.2d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Prudente v. McCall
218 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Sullivan v. Regan
206 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Rossiello v. Regan
203 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A.D.2d 861, 596 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-new-york-state-comptroller-nyappdiv-1993.