Torres v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Torres v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission

268 A.D.2d 340, 700 N.Y.S.2d 824, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 480

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 340 (Torres v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torres v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission, 268 A.D.2d 340, 700 N.Y.S.2d 824, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission dated March 17, 1997, revoking petitioner’s hack license pursuant to 35 RCNY 2-70 (e) upon a finding that he had been found guilty of three class I violations of respondent’s rules within a 24-month period, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.], entered February 10, 1999) dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner was given reasonable notice of and a fair opportunity to be heard with respect to the three underlying violations, and was not otherwise deprived of due process. We have considered and rejected petitioner’s argument that the penalty of license revocation is excessive. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission dated March 17, 1997, revoking petitioner’s hack license pursuant to 35 RCNY 2-70 (e) upon a finding that he had been found guilty of three class I violations of respondent’s rules within a 24-month period, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.], entered February 10, 1999) dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner was given reasonable notice of and a fair opportunity to be heard with respect to the three underlying violations, and was not otherwise deprived of due process. We have considered and rejected petitioner’s argument that the penalty of license revocation is excessive. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 340, 700 N.Y.S.2d 824, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-new-york-city-taxi-limousine-commission-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack