Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Torres v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

Torres v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

82 A.D.3d 530, 918 N.Y.2d 712
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.3d 530 (Torres v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torres v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 82 A.D.3d 530, 918 N.Y.2d 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The record clearly demonstrates that decedent’s relationship with the hospital ceased, at the latest, on July 26, 2006, when she was discharged. Plaintiffs notice of claim was not served within the requisite 90-day period after the claim arose (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]), and no motion for leave to file a late notice of claim was made within one year and 90 days after accrual of the claim (see General Municipal Law [531]*531§ 50-e [5]; § 50-i [1]; McCrae v City of New York, 44 AD3d 306 [2007]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCrae v. City of New York
44 A.D.3d 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 530, 918 N.Y.2d 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-nyappdiv-2011.