Torres v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Torres v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

847 So. 2d 568, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8756, 2003 WL 21347177

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 2003·No. No. 3D03-162·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants seek review of an adverse summary judgment on insurance coverage. As to the procedural point, see Tingle v. Dade County Board of County Commissioners, 245 So.2d 76, 78 (Fla.1971) (successor judge may “vacate or modify the interlocutory rulings or orders [569]*569of his predecessor in the case”) (emphasis in original); Wasa International Ins. Co. v. Hurtado, 749 So.2d 579, 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). On the merits, we entirely agree with Judge Leesfield that the insurance policy by its terms excluded coverage for the appellants-lessees.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants seek review of an adverse summary judgment on insurance coverage. As to the procedural point, see Tingle v. Dade County Board of County Commissioners, 245 So.2d 76, 78 (Fla.1971) (successor judge may “vacate or modify the interlocutory rulings or orders [569]*569of his predecessor in the case”) (emphasis in original); Wasa International Ins. Co. v. Hurtado, 749 So.2d 579, 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). On the merits, we entirely agree with Judge Leesfield that the insurance policy by its terms excluded coverage for the appellants-lessees.

Affirmed.

Torres v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, 847 So. 2d 568, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8756, 2003 WL 21347177 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

847 So. 2d 568 (Torres v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related