Torres v. Livorno Restaurant Corp.
This text of 221 A.D.2d 197 (Torres v. Livorno Restaurant Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered June 8, 1994, which directed that judgment be entered in the amount of the jury award of $86,500, unanimously affirmed without costs.
The IAS Court properly reformed the stipulation of settlement placed on the record in open court to reflect the true intentions of the parties in entering into a "high-low” settlement agreement. Although the agreement placed on the record was not ambiguous, the court was warranted in concluding that it was the product of mistake since its terms were contradictory to that which is universally understood to be a "high-low” agreement (Curtis v Albee, 167 NY 360, 364; Pahl Equip. Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 29). If the court had vitiated the stipulation altogether, plaintiff would have received a lower judgment in the sum of $73,525, taking into account the 15% [198]*198reduction of the $86,500 jury award which would have been mandated for his comparative negligence. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D.2d 197, 633 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-livorno-restaurant-corp-nyappdiv-1995.