Torres v. Gomez
This text of Torres v. Gomez (Torres v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CYNTHIA TORRES,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D18-2501
JUAN O. GOMEZ,
Respondent. ________________________________/ Opinion filed August 31, 2018
Petition for Writ of Prohibition, Diana Michelle Tennis, Respondent Judge.
Stephen Brown, of Brown & Rice, P. A., Orlando, for Petitioner.
Natalie D. Hall, Orlando for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Cynthia Torres petitions this court for a writ of prohibition to review the denial of
her motion to disqualify the Honorable Diana Michelle Tennis from presiding over her
domestic relations matter. We grant the petition and quash the order because the
disqualification motion was legally sufficient since the facts alleged, which must be
presumed true, would reasonably cause Torres to have a well-founded fear that she
would not receive a fair hearing before Judge Tennis. See Minaya v. State, 118 So. 3d
926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Ennis v. Ennis, 855 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the order denying the disqualification motion
and remand for assignment to a different judge.
PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED; CAUSE REMANDED.
PALMER, EVANDER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Torres v. Gomez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-gomez-fladistctapp-2018.