Torres v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

983 So. 2d 10, 2008 WL 2185336
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2008
Docket3D07-2742
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 983 So. 2d 10 (Torres v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torres v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 983 So. 2d 10, 2008 WL 2185336 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

983 So.2d 10 (2008)

Aydee TORRES, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Valls Group, Inc., Appellees.

No. 3D07-2742.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 2008.

Aydee Torres, in proper person.

John D. Maher, Deputy General Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee, Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Before COPE and WELLS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which upheld a denial of unemployment compensation benefits.

The appeals referee dismissed claimant-appellant Aydee Torres' appeal as to certain of her earlier applications for benefits, on the ground that the appeal was not timely filed with regard to the earlier claims. The Unemployment Appeals Commission affirmed that ruling and we see no error.

The Commission upheld the denial of benefits on the remaining claims because at the time of the hearing, the claimant was physically unable to work. The Commission states that under the statute, in *11 order to claim unemployment benefits, it is required that the claimant "is able to work and is available for work." § 443.091(1)(c)1., Fla. Stat. (2007). The claimant testified that she would not be able to resume work until she had back surgery.

We affirm the Commission's ruling. See Buns Unlimited of Fla., Inc., v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 508 So.2d 786, 788 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to the claimant to reapply for benefits at such time as she is able and available for work, if at that time she is unable to obtain employment and qualifies under the statute.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caraballo v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
28 So. 3d 971 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 So. 2d 10, 2008 WL 2185336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2008.