Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 2023
Docket6:22-cv-00593
StatusUnknown

This text of Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security (Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security, (M.D. Fla. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

SHIRLEY S. TORRES,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 6:22-cv-593-MAP

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Defendant. /

ORDER Before me is Plaintiff’s Uncontested Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (doc. 25). Plaintiff seeks payment of attorney’s fees in the amount of $3,496.29 to be paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel pursuant to the EAJA.1 On November 2, 2022, I entered an Order remanding Plaintiff’s case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings (doc. 23); the Clerk of Court entered judgment in Plaintiff’s favor on November 3, 2022 (doc. 24).2

1 Attorney Robert A. Culbertson requests fees at the hourly rate of $234.65 for 1.0 hours of work performed in 2022, and attorney Sarah P. Jacobs requests fees at the hourly rate of $234.65 for 13.9 hours of work performed in 2022-23 for a total of $3,496.29 (doc. 25 at 2).

2 The plaintiff in a social security case has 30 days beyond the 60-day appeal window to apply for fees and other expenses under the EAJA, for a total of 90 days after judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Gates v. Barnhart, 325 F. Supp. 2d 1342, 1343 (M.D. Fla. 2002). In this case, Plaintiff timely filed her application for fees on January 20, 2023 (doc. 25). In Reeves v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 732 (11th Cir. 2008), the Eleventh Circuit held that an EAJA fee award is awarded to the “prevailing party,” not to counsel. However, in this case, Plaintiff has agreed to assign the EAJA award to her counsel (doc. 25-1). The Commissioner does not oppose Plaintiff's motion. Therefore, by virtue of the fee assignment and Defendant’s lack of opposition, the award is payable to Plaintiff's counsel. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Uncontested Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (doc. 25) is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $3,496.29, to be paid directly to Plaintiffs counsel, if Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the Government.’ DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on January 25, 2023.

MARK A. PIZZO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

> The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If she does, fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's counsel to satisfy the debt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reeves v. Astrue
526 F.3d 732 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Gates v. Barnhart
325 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (M.D. Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-v-commissioner-of-social-security-flmd-2023.