Torres-Salas v. Holder
This text of 348 F. App'x 248 (Torres-Salas v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Francisco Torres-Salas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the former Legalization Appeals Unit’s (“LAU”) order dismissing Torres-Salas’ appeal from the denial of his Special Agricultural Worker (“SAW”) application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a SAW application, Perez-Martin v. Ashcroft, 394 F.3d 752, 758 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The LAU did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Torres-Salas’ SAW appeal where Torres-Salas provided insufficient evidence of qualifying employment. See Perez-Martin, 394 F.3d at 759-60 (to overcome derogatory government evidence, an applicant must provide enough evidence to show qualifying employment “as a matter of just and reasonable inference”) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1160(b)(3)(B)(iii)).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
348 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-salas-v-holder-ca9-2009.