Torres-Refulio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Ninth Circuit

Torres-Refulio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

10 F. App'x 456

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 26, 2001

DocketNo. 99-70923; INS No. A72-990-183

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. App'x 456 (Torres-Refulio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torres-Refulio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 10 F. App'x 456 (9th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM²

Eduardo Melquiades Torres-Refulio, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions pro se for review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum. We dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction because Torres-Refulio filed his petition for review beyond the mandatory filing deadline. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM²

Eduardo Melquiades Torres-Refulio, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions pro se for review of a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum. We dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction because Torres-Refulio filed his petition for review beyond the mandatory filing deadline. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. App'x 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-refulio-v-immigration-naturalization-service-ca9-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack