Torres, Ramon Jr.
This text of Torres, Ramon Jr. (Torres, Ramon Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-88,245-05
EX PARTE RAMON TORRES, JR., Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1541830-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to sixty years’
imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Torres v. State, 609
S.W.3d 595 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] September 3, 2020) (pet. ref’d). Applicant filed this
application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded
it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective because trial
counsel failed to object to improper comments by the prosecutor during closing arguments, failed
to file a motion to allow Applicant to testify without impeachment with prior extraneous offenses
pursuant to Theus v. State, 845 S.W.2d 874 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992), failed to investigate and obtain 2
surveillance video footage from a gas station where the complainant allegedly encountered him
before the offense and returned after the offense, failed to retain a defense D.N.A. expert, and failed
to challenge or strike a venire member who said that he would afford law enforcement officers more
credibility than defense witnesses.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate
forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial
counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use any
means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the
trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of
counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: January 11, 2023 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Torres, Ramon Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torres-ramon-jr-texcrimapp-2023.