Torres De Romo v. Holder

360 F. App'x 741
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2009·No. 06-70553·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Esther Torres De Romo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) reinstatement of a prior order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and due process claims. Garcia de Rincon v. Dep’t Homeland Security, 539 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th *742 Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

Torres De Romo’s contention that the IJ erred in reinstating her removal order without determining her eligibility for adjustment of status fails because she was not eligible for an adjustment of status because she reentered the United States without permission after being removed. See Gonzales v. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 508 F.3d 1227, 1242 (9th Cir.2007) (abrogating Perez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 783 (9th Cir.2004)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torres De Romo v. Holder, 360 F. App'x 741 (9th Cir. 2009).

360 F. App'x 741 (Torres De Romo v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzales v. Department of Homeland Security
508 F.3d 1227 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Garcia De Rincon v. Department of Homeland SEC.
539 F.3d 1133 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)