Torrence v. Van Emburg
2 N.J.L. 106
This text of 2 N.J.L. 106 (Torrence v. Van Emburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Torrence v. Van Emburg, 2 N.J.L. 106 (N.J. 1806).
Opinion
— Here was a trial in the absence of the defendant, and no witness examined; the state of demand was not susceptible of proof in any other way than by witnesses, or the confession of the defendant. The defendant not being present, could have made no confession. So that here is a judgment, without evidence. It must therefore be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 N.J.L. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrence-v-van-emburg-nj-1806.