Torrence v. Irwin

2 Yeates 210
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1797·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

■By the court.

This species of action is founded on possession, 4 Term Rep. 490 ; and the plaintiff at the time of the commission of the trespass, must either have an actual or constructive possession. 1 Term Rep. 480. Though it has been held, that where the owner of lands contracts with others for the sowing it &c. on the halves, he only can have clausum fregit, Cro. El. 144, 1 Leon. 315, Goulds. 77, 3 Leon. 213, 2 Tri. per Pais. 545, yet wre know of no case wherein the landlord having leased to another paying rent, and parted with the possession entirely, can support trespass. Vide 3 Lev. 209. 1 Ld. Ray. 739.

Verdict for the defendant.

[A new trial was moved for in December term following, but the court refused it una vocel\

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torrence v. Irwin, 2 Yeates 210 (Pa. 1797).

2 Yeates 210 (Torrence v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greber v. Kleckner
2 Pa. 289 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1845)
Case v. Shepherd
2 Johns. Cas. 27 (New York Supreme Court, 1800)