Torrence v. Irwin

2 Yeates 210
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 15, 1797
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Yeates 210 (Torrence v. Irwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torrence v. Irwin, 2 Yeates 210 (Pa. 1797).

Opinion

■By the court.

This species of action is founded on possession, 4 Term Rep. 490 ; and the plaintiff at the time of the commission of the trespass, must either have an actual or constructive possession. 1 Term Rep. 480. Though it has been held, that where the owner of lands contracts with others for the sowing it &c. on the halves, he only can have clausum fregit, Cro. El. 144, 1 Leon. 315, Goulds. 77, 3 Leon. 213, 2 Tri. per Pais. 545, yet wre know of no case wherein the landlord having leased to another paying rent, and parted with the possession entirely, can support trespass. Vide 3 Lev. 209. 1 Ld. Ray. 739.

Verdict for the defendant.

[A new trial was moved for in December term following, but the court refused it una vocel\

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greber v. Kleckner
2 Pa. 289 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1845)
Case v. Shepherd
2 Johns. Cas. 27 (New York Supreme Court, 1800)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Yeates 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrence-v-irwin-pa-1797.