Torrealday v. Torrealday

761 So. 2d 1246, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8740, 2000 WL 973734
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 12, 2000·No. No. 2D99-2111·Published

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

The husband challenges the final order of dissolution of marriage contending that the trial court erred in awarding permanent alimony and in distributing assets to the wife. We disagree and affirm the final order without discussion. We do, howev[1247]*1247er, agree, as does the wife, with the husband’s contention that the trial court failed to provide language in the final order that alimony would terminate upon the death of either party or remarriage of the wife. We therefore remand for modification of the final order to reflect such language. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Hunt v. Hunt, 481 So.2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torrealday v. Torrealday, 761 So. 2d 1246, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8740, 2000 WL 973734 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

761 So. 2d 1246 (Torrealday v. Torrealday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Hunt v. Hunt
481 So. 2d 995 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)