Torre v. Vecchione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Torre v. Vecchione

221 A.D.2d 623, 635 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12462

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 221 A.D.2d 623 (Torre v. Vecchione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torre v. Vecchione, 221 A.D.2d 623, 635 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for partition of real property, the defendants appeal from an order and interlocutory judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated January 31, 1994, which, inter alia, directed that the property be sold at auction.

Ordered that the order and interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the failure of the plaintiffs or their predecessor-in-title to contribute towards the maintenance of the subject property did not preclude the court from ordering partition by sale (see, Bufogle v Greek, 152 AD2d 527).

We have examined the appellants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, for partition of real property, the defendants appeal from an order and interlocutory judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated January 31, 1994, which, inter alia, directed that the property be sold at auction.

Ordered that the order and interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the failure of the plaintiffs or their predecessor-in-title to contribute towards the maintenance of the subject property did not preclude the court from ordering partition by sale (see, Bufogle v Greek, 152 AD2d 527).

We have examined the appellants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 623, 635 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torre-v-vecchione-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack