Torre v. Commissioner
This text of 52 F. App'x 965 (Torre v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Taxpayer Robert C. Torre appeals pro se the Tax Court’s determination that Torre failed to properly report $5,603 of income from a mutual account fund for the 1997 tax year. We have jurisdiction to review the final order of the Tax Court under 26 U.S.C. § 7482. We review the Tax Court’s legal conclusions de novo, and its factual findings for clear error. Estate of Rapp v. Comm’r, 140 F.3d 1211, 1215 (9th Cir.1998). We affirm.
The Tax Court correctly determined that Torre failed to properly report $5,603 of income from a mutual account fund for the 1997 tax year. See Comm’r v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323, 327-28, 115 S.Ct. 2159, 132 L.Ed.2d 294 (1995) (noting the broad definition of “gross income” under 26 U.S.C. § 61(a)).
Torre was not entitled to a jury trial. See Dawn v. Comm’r, 675 F.2d 1077, 1079 (9th Cir.1982) (stating that taxpayers are not entitled to jury trial in tax court).
Torre’s remaining contentions are rejected as unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F. App'x 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torre-v-commissioner-ca9-2002.