Torrance v. West

Ohio Supreme Court

Torrance v. West

914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1413

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 6, 2009

Docket2009-1749

StatusPublished

This text of 914 N.E.2d 409 (Torrance v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torrance v. West, 914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon review of relator’s proffered affidavit of indigency, submitted to waive the filing fee and security deposit,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that within ten days of the date of this order relator shall either submit the $40 filing fee and $100 security deposit required by S.Ct.Prae.R. XV or show good cause why he should be permitted to proceed with this action, or any future actions, without payment of the filing fee and security deposit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon review of relator’s proffered affidavit of indigency, submitted to waive the filing fee and security deposit,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that within ten days of the date of this order relator shall either submit the $40 filing fee and $100 security deposit required by S.Ct.Prae.R. XV or show good cause why he should be permitted to proceed with this action, or any future actions, without payment of the filing fee and security deposit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

914 N.E.2d 409, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrance-v-west-ohio-2009.