Torrance v. U.S. Dept. of Hous. & Urban Dev.
This text of 915 N.E.2d 659 (Torrance v. U.S. Dept. of Hous. & Urban Dev.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus, Procedendo, Prohibition, and Quo Warranto. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus, prohibition, procedendo, and quo warranto. Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to declare relator a vexatious litigator,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and Saint Torrance is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5)(B). Accordingly,
It is ordered by the court that Saint Torrance is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the Clerk of this court for the court’s review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
915 N.E.2d 659, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrance-v-us-dept-of-hous-urban-dev-ohio-2009.