Torrance v. Court of Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Torrance v. Court of Appeals

915 N.E.2d 663, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1439

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 29, 2009

Docket2009-1538

StatusPublished

This text of 915 N.E.2d 663 (Torrance v. Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torrance v. Court of Appeals, 915 N.E.2d 663, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On October 26, 2009, this court found Saint Torrance to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5)(B). This court further ordered that Torrance was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Upon review of the documents filed in this case, the court finds the case to be without merit. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the case is dismissed and all pending motions are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On October 26, 2009, this court found Saint Torrance to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5)(B). This court further ordered that Torrance was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Upon review of the documents filed in this case, the court finds the case to be without merit. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the case is dismissed and all pending motions are denied as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

915 N.E.2d 663, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrance-v-court-of-appeals-ohio-2009.